Does fi_av_xfer need the tagged capability?
bturrubiates opened this issue · comments
@shefty I just noticed the recent addition of the fi_av_xfer test. Looks useful, but our provider can't make use of it for RDM since it requires tagged messaging. I don't know the background of the test, but it doesn't seem integral to the test. Would it be worth it to add an option that can run over RDM without tagged messaging?
I think tagged was used in place of FI_DIRECT_RECV, but I don't think it currently needs either. Letting the test use either msg or tagged calls seems fine.