Default configuration not working at all under evil mode

[Brett Stahlman]

I have the following in my .emacs:

(require 'lispy)
(require 'lispyville)
(add-hook 'scheme-mode-hook #'lispy-mode)
(add-hook 'lispy-mode-hook #'lispyville-mode)
(require 'evil)
(evil-mode t)

When I open a .scm file, I have access to a few lispyville operators, but very little lispy functionality: e.g., stuff like [, ], and lispy-flow are missing, and most of the lispy bindings I see involve Control or Meta keys. Positioning point on a paren doesn't put me in lispy special. Disabling evil mode makes all the lispy bindings available, and allows me to get into lispy special. As I understand it, lispyville is meant to work under evil mode, so how do I make evil, lispyville and lispy work together?

Thanks,
Brett S.

[Fox Kiester]

What is the behavior that you are expecting? Are the lispy keybindings not working in insert (or emacs) state?

As for your question on the melpa pull request, you need to have a recent lispy (around a few months old should be fine) installed from melpa (not melpa stable).

[Brett Stahlman]

Was expecting to enter lispy special when I landed on a paren with [ or ]. But just a little bit ago, I discovered variable lispyville-motions-put-into-special, and realized I could get the behavior I was expecting by setting it to non-nil. I guess I'll need to read through the README a bit more to get a better feel for key themes and the relationship between lispy and lispyville. I was originally thinking of lispyville as just a sort of wrapper for lispy, but as I perused the README earlier, I realized that's an oversimplification, to say the least...

[Fox Kiester]

Yes, lispyville doesn't add any new states or try to override normal state keys at special locations.

If you have any other questions or suggestions, feel free to make a new issue.

[Brett Stahlman]

Understood. I'm going to spend some time going through the lispyville and
lispy documentation, playing around in emacs, trying to figure out what
configuration works best for me. No doubt, I'll have more questions at some
point. ;-)

Thanks,
Brett S.

On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Fox Kiester [e-mail]
wrote:

Yes, lispyville doesn't add any new states or try to override normal state
keys at special locations.

If you have any other questions or suggestions, feel free to make a new
issue.

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#15 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC7pQKVGg7lqGa199KWmQ7fOHV_TcagBks5qwT1ngaJpZM4KLW2w
.