Send data of two inverters in one config
nicks-technik opened this issue · comments
Hi,
I have 2 micro-inverters which report in solarman.
For both I made a config.json which are working, but is it possible, to integrate both inverters into one config.json.
Something like the following?
{
{
"name": "TrannergyOne",
"url": "api.solarmanpv.com",
"appid": "app",
"secret": "sec",
"username": "1@test.com",
"passhash": "345",
"stationId": 111,
"inverterId": 333,
"loggerId": 555,
"debug" : false,
"mqtt":{
"broker": "1.1.1.1",
"port": 1883,
"topic": "solarmanpv",
"username": "",
"password": ""
}
},
{
"name": "TrannergyTwo",
"url": "api.solarmanpv.com",
"appid": "app",
"secret": "sec",
"username": "1@test.com",
"passhash": "345",
"stationId": 222,
"inverterId": 444,
"loggerId": 666,
"debug" : false,
"mqtt":{
"broker": "1.1.1.1",
"port": 1883,
"topic": "solarmanpv",
"username": "",
"password": ""
}
}
Is there a way to let such an example working?
Or how should I run the two configs?
Thank you
I still have no solultion to track my MICRO_INVERTERS with one config.json
Also this config.json is not working
[
{
"name": "TrannergyOne",
"url": "api.solarmanpv.com",
"appid": "app",
"secret": "sec",
"username": "1@test.com",
"passhash": "345",
"stationId": 111,
"inverterId": 333,
"loggerId": 555,
"debug" : false,
"mqtt":{
"broker": "1.1.1.1",
"port": 1883,
"topic": "solarmanpv",
"username": "",
"password": ""
}
},
{
"name": "TrannergyTwo",
"url": "api.solarmanpv.com",
"appid": "app",
"secret": "sec",
"username": "1@test.com",
"passhash": "345",
"stationId": 222,
"inverterId": 444,
"loggerId": 666,
"debug" : false,
"mqtt":{
"broker": "1.1.1.1",
"port": 1883,
"topic": "solarmanpv",
"username": "",
"password": ""
}
}
]
Output:
Creating network "solarman-mqtt_default" with the default driver
Creating solarman-mqtt ... done
Attaching to solarman-mqtt
solarman-mqtt | INFO:root:Starting daemonized with a 300 seconds run interval
solarman-mqtt | ERROR:root:Error on start: list indices must be integers or slices, not str
Help is very welcome.
Thank you
Hmm, good one. I'd suggest running two separate instances for now.