3 | ¯4 results in 2 in BQNPAD and the online REPL
ionse opened this issue · comments
I feel the result should be 1, unless I'm missing something...?
I did test with the left argument set to 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, with correct results.
Well, ¯4+2×3 is 2 so I believe your arithmetic's just off. And here's Python:
>>> -4 % 3
2
In case there's any confusion about C-like modular division (although your comment about other arguments wouldn't be consistent with that), BQN always returns a non-negative result for positive 𝕨.
Many thanks for getting back to me so fast.
I'm new to BQN and you are correct, I got my wires crossed!
Chris
…------- Original Message -------
On Friday, September 9th, 2022 at 16:48, Marshall Lochbaum ***@***.***> wrote:
Well, ¯4+2×3 is 2 so I believe you're arithmetic's just off. And here's Python:
>>> -4 % 3
2
In case there's any confusion about C-like modular division (although your comment about other arguments wouldn't be consistent with that), BQN always returns a non-negative result for positive 𝕨.
—
Reply to this email directly, [view it on GitHub](#79 (comment)), or [unsubscribe](https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AI7ZORQP5OIDWTDQW2NXVV3V5OPARANCNFSM6AAAAAAQI7FUZE).
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>