Redundant Validity check.
jfsuarezb opened this issue · comments
Line 162 in 35237fb
Why is the equality between the unspent transaction id and the new transaction uxto reference id being checked for twice? Why can't you just do uTxO.txOutId === txIn.txOutId instead of uTxO.txOutId === txIn.txOutId && uTxO.txOutId === txIn.txOutId?
They might have wanted to say uTxO.TxOutIndex == txIn.TxOutIndex && uTxO.TxId == txIn.TxId