Use poorboy instead of own worker pool implementation
hauleth opened this issue · comments
This should provide more flexible implementation.
Do you mean "Poolboy"? If so, it wouldn't work too well with how Fluxter is designed (where you can just fire and forget on a connection). Checking out connections wouldn't bring benefits. Is there a particular reason you are proposing this? How would it be more flexible?
Closing the issue for not having further feedback. @hauleth feel free to reopen. 