some~> and some~>>
greghendershott opened this issue · comments
rackjure provides some~>
like Clojure's some->
. Ditto for >>
flavor. I'll need to continue to provide those.
AFAICT this is the same as your and~>
and and~>>
?
- I'd welcome another set of eyeballs in case I'm missing a difference.
- Assuming they're the same, I could re-provide
and~>{>}
with an aliassome~>{>}
, in rackjure. Unless you wanted to do so here. (Either is fine with me; I'm happy to do it in rackjure. Just wanted to ask first. Because if you were to add it, later, it would break rackjure unless I required youonly-in
. But I'd prefer not to useonly-in
, I'd prefer that rackjure is just a simple reprovide of whatever you might add in the future.)
Yep, they are intended to be 100% the same, just with a different (hopefully slightly more obvious) name. If they function any differently in any way, it's probably a bug.