LeartS / noether

Algebra utilities for Elixir

Geek Repo:Geek Repo

Github PK Tool:Github PK Tool

Noether

Build Status

Noether aims to ease common data manipulation tasks by introducing simple algebraic functions and other utilities. Functions and names are inspired (sometimes taken as-is) from Haskell.

The Maybe module introduces operations on nullable values. The Either module introduces operations on {:ok, _} | {:error, _} values. The List module introduces operations on lists.

The root module has a few simple functions one might find of use.

Installation

def deps do
  [
    {:noether, "~> 0.2.2"}
  ]
end

Examples

Here is a list of real world scenarios where you may find that using constructs like Maybe and Either make your code less verbose, more straightforward, and easier to read.

Suppose you have a function that returns a list of items, and you want to take the first element (if the list is not empty), apply a function to it, and wrap it in a nice {:ok, _} or {:error, _} tuple.

Without Noether, you would write something like this:

function_that_returns_list_of_items()
|> List.first()
|> update_item(&f/1)
|> case do
  nil ->
    {:error, :not_found}

  item ->
    {:ok, item}
end

defp update_item(nil), do: nil
defp update_item(item, f), do: f.(item)

That's kind of verbose, especially since you need to type the functions that pattern match on nil and those that wrap a result in a tuple. Moreover, what if function_that_returns_list_of_items does not return just a list, but it may return an error as well? That's another case do!

Let's see how we could accomplish the same with Noether:

alias Noether.Maybe

function_that_returns_list_of_items()
|> List.first()
|> Maybe.map(&f/1)
|> Maybe.required(:not_found)

Maybe operates on nullable values, while Either operates on {:ok, _} or {:error, _} tuples. Let's see how we can reduce the verbosity of elixir with operator using Either.bind/2.

Suppose you have N chained calls to different functions, where each one may return a tuple, and finally you want to return the "unwrapped" result to the caller. Normally, you would accomplish it this way:

with {:ok, _res1} <- f1(),
  {:ok, _res2} <- f2(),
  {:ok, _res3} <- f3(),
  {:ok, res4} <- f4() do
  res4
end

It can easily get frustrating and error-prone to write everytime the same {:ok, _} matches. Let's see how we can do this using Noether:

alias Noether.Either
alias Noether.List

[f1(), f2(), f3(), f4()]
|> List.sequence()
|> Either.unwrap()

Easier to read, less verbose, and it encapsulates the handling of {:ok, _} tuples. You can focus on writing actual logic instead of repeating the same pattern matches every time.

After looking at Maybe and Either, let's take a look at List. Suppose you have two lists of numbers you want to sum in order, just like this:

[1, 2, 3]
|> Enum.zip([4, 5, 6])
|> Enum.map(fn {a, b} -> a + b end)

Noether has a built-in zip_with function coming to the rescue:

alias Noether.List, as: NList

NList.zip_with([1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6], &(&1 + &2))

Contributing

Feel free to propose any function you deem useful and even vaguely related to the ones currently present.
Regarding naming, we have a couple of conventions:

  • function names should be taken from Haskell if they exist, aliases with Scala naming are possible (e.g. bind is aliased into flat_map)
  • function arguments are named a, b, c ... if values (exception: default), f, g, h ... if functions

mix test runs the tests.
mix format.all formats all the files under lib/.
mix check checks if the files are formatted; it then runs a linter (credo) and a type checker (dyalixir).

Special thanks to our contributors!

About

Algebra utilities for Elixir


Languages

Language:Elixir 100.0%