Not to be used for commercial work?

[DD]

Hi. Maybe I humbly inquire as to the choice of the AGPL license for this work?
As opposed to commercial friendly licenses like Apache, Boost (BSL), MIT, or BSD licenses?

[Laurynas Biveinis]

Hi, honestly at the time of repo creation I did not think it would develop to the point of mattering so chose "anything" to proceed.

I can change the license as circumstances require

[DD]

Thanks. FWIW, as it stands (AGPL), there are zero changes I'll be able to use what seems like a very interesting project.
I'm actually not 100% sure I could have leveraged this project, even with a different more commercial-friendly license,
that would require more investigation on my part, but given the AGPL, taking the time to investigate seems moot.
Note that I'm not complaining, it's your right to use whatever license you prefer, I'm just sharing my particular situation as an FYI.

[Laurynas Biveinis]

@ddevienne, consider this project to be Apache-licensed. I will take care of license change formalities next time I have a chance, likely tomorrow

[DD]

Thank you very much!