BSD License Clause

Question

BSD License Clause

subashthirumaran opened this issue 8 years ago · comments

Subash Chandran Thirumaran commented 8 years ago

Can you please mention the version of BSD license for the module?

Andreas Offenhaeuser · Answer 1 · Mon Mar 20 2017 21:26:43 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time)

I think this was fixed with 81ca359. Do you plan to release a patch version that pushes this change into the ecosystem? Would be much appreciated :)

Henry Rieke · Answer 2 · Mon Jun 25 2018 21:45:10 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time)

You might want to re-open this issue; the files links.js and validate.js have an MIT License in the header; which is fine, but certainly needs to be mentioned in the readme & package.json, etc.
If you changed those licenses to be dual licensed under BDS 3 or AFL 2.1, then you should update links.js and validate.js to state the proper license.
Thank you!

ihbar · Answer 3 · Wed Sep 18 2019 22:01:02 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time)

Seems to be fixed by version 0.2.5, : BSD version is mentioned, and files have been updated.
Ticket could be closed ?
Thanks a lot for the fix.