License question
lilith opened this issue · comments
I don't want to offend - if you're a big fan of the GPL I apologize - but as the developer of several OSS imaging libraries, I've found the Apache license (or even MIT/BSD) to encourage contributions much more effectively. Update 2016: I now use AGPLv3, and offer commercial licenses. Slightly fewer contributions but more effective overall at making projects sustainable
I originally released GPL/LGPL myself, but got 0 contributions. Under MIT/Apache I've seen hundreds....
What you've built here is fantastic; I'd love to integrate my libraries with it. But under the GPL, I'm unable to.
I've released some BSD-licensed projects and I didn't see substantial difference in contributions.
I prefer GPL, because non-FOSS licenses allow certain things, like restricting software with DRM, that I don't want to support.