Fails to build on arm

[brian m. carlson]

As mentioned in the docs for std::sync::atomic, AtomicI64 isn't portable because not all systems have 64-bit atomics. At least 32-bit ARM, PowerPC, and MIPS do not, and I'd like to both use Flurry and support those architectures (my supported architectures are those of Debian where Rust is available).

Is it possible that the AtomicI64 could be an AtomicIsize here to better accommodate 32-bit platforms?

[Jon Gjengset]

So, maybe. The problem with doing that is that a 32-bit counter here could much more reasonably overflow. I would potentially recommend falling back to a RwLock<HashMap> on those platforms instead.