Jun 2018 clarify: Handling of union types (#266, #441, #464)
jlouis opened this issue · comments
Jesper Louis Andersen commented
Handle these cases
Jesper Louis Andersen commented
- 266 says "Union types must be unique"
- 441 says "Thou must not declare empty unions"
- 464 says "We messed up the description, lets fix it"
So this means we need two test cases:
- Create an empty union and have it fail
- Create a union with the same type occurring twice and have it fail
Jesper Louis Andersen commented
This has now been handled on master
.