Need links to v2 and v3 RFCs
davenoveck opened this issue · comments
This is a real gap. Unfortunately, xml2rfc had the v2 RFC link but never got the v3.
@davenoveck Can you elaborate?
And if you and provide an example.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021, 6:36 PM Kesara Rathnayake ***@***.***> wrote:
@davenoveck <https://github.com/davenoveck> Can you elaborate?
Sure. At the time I complained about this to Lars, there was a link on the
xml2rfc page to rfc7749 but no link to RFC 7791 which was really annoying
given that the page supported both v2 and v3. Now, I have just looked at
the page again and it does have an obscure link to rfc7791 which hard to
see since the text is a statement in a later paragraph that the v3 spec
"has been published" (which happened five years ago). I may have missed
this but the way this was presented would have made it easy to miss.
Turning now to the author-tools replacement, there are now links to these
RFCs but they are hard to find for a different reason. In contrast to the
loquaciousness of the old page, in this page, the links are hard to see
because of an extreme condensation: the text of the link to RFC 7749 is
"v2" and of the link to RFC 7791 the text is "v3".
And if you and provide an example.
No point.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Where? By whom?
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
… <#34 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACOIBZPH2IKNSDT2OWIU5TUIXLWPANCNFSM5GIYJA7Q>
.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS
<https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675>
or Android
<https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.