Apache 2 Compliance
maudineormsby opened this issue · comments
Apache 2 requires that you have a LICENSE file, a NOTICE file, and a License header on each source file.
See http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new
I think we need to:
1: Add a NOTICE File
2: Fix the copyright attribution(s)
3: Add the header to all the source files in the repo.
Maybe this is the time to have a conversation about what license should really be on this. I'm looking for something free/open and non-viral. Anyone have a favorite?
Dan Cuellar
Lead Software Engineer - Test Team | Zoosk
989 Market St. San Francisco, CA 94103
+1 415 857 BUGS (2847) | d@zoosk.com (mailto:d@zoosk.com)
On Thursday, November 15, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Jason Carr wrote:
Apache 2 requires that you have a LICENSE file, a NOTICE file, and a License header on each source file.
See http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new
I think we need to:
1: Add a NOTICE File
2: Fix the copyright attribution(s)
3: Add the header to all the source files in the repo.—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/hugs/appium/issues/13).
My favorite is Apache 2. I think we have the right license, we just need to apply it properly. I'd love to hear if there are any other opinions though.
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Dan Cuellar notifications@github.com wrote:
Maybe this is the time to have a conversation about what license should
really be on this.
No, it's not. :-)
I'm looking for something free/open and non-viral. Anyone
have a favorite?
Apache2 looks long, but in effect, it's basically as free, open, and
non-viral as BSD & MIT are. It's just that the Apache2 license takes
pages and pages to deal explicitly with patents.
Footnote to history: Android is Apache2. It really is a good license.
http://source.android.com/source/licenses.html
- hugs
So it sounds like we're in agreement that we should correct how we apply the apache2 license.
Dan Cuellar
Lead Software Engineer - Test Team | Zoosk
989 Market St. San Francisco, CA 94103
+1 415 857 BUGS (2847) | d@zoosk.com (mailto:d@zoosk.com)
On Friday, November 16, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Jason Huggins wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Dan Cuellar <notifications@github.com (mailto:notifications@github.com)> wrote:
Maybe this is the time to have a conversation about what license should
really be on this.No, it's not. :-)
I'm looking for something free/open and non-viral. Anyone
have a favorite?Apache2 looks long, but in effect, it's basically as free, open, and
non-viral as BSD & MIT are. It's just that the Apache2 license takes
pages and pages to deal explicitly with patents.Footnote to history: Android is Apache2. It really is a good license.
http://source.android.com/source/licenses.html
- hugs
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/hugs/appium/issues/13#issuecomment-10459691).