How to avoid extra band with Sixels
AmaruCoder opened this issue · comments
What does chafa --version
say? We've had a bit of back and forth on sixel transparency, since different terminals handle this differently. I think we finally got it right in version 1.14.3.
It says:
Chafa version 1.14.4
Loaders: GIF JPEG PNG QOI SVG TIFF WebP XWD
Features: mmx sse4.1 popcnt avx2
Applying: mmx sse4.1 popcnt avx2
Copyright (C) 2018-2023 Hans Petter Jansson et al.
Incl. libnsgif copyright (C) 2004 Richard Wilson, copyright (C) 2008 Sean Fox
Incl. LodePNG copyright (C) 2005-2018 Lode Vandevenne
Incl. QOI decoder copyright (C) 2021 Dominic Szablewski
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
Looks like a persistent bug, then. Have you tried -t .01
as a workaround?
Also, which terminal are you on?
Thank you. I tried -t .01
but got the same band. I am using iTerm2 Build 3.5.5
.
Thanks. I think this is likely specific to iTerm2 output.
Thank you. My workaround for now is to set the background to black in iTerm2, and use -t 1.0
in Chafa.
Ok. This works fine on the terminals I have access to on Linux/Windows, and unfortunately I don't have Mac hardware to test with, but I'll look into getting it installed in a VM. I have a few other things to attend to first, though.
In the meantime I have two questions for you:
- Do transparent sixels from other programs display fine? E.g.
lsix
,convert
with an image with an alpha channel. - Does your test case display correctly in other terminals you have access to, if any? E.g. Wezterm.
Thank you for the followup. I don't h ave lsix
or convert
installed, but I have tested it in Wezterm and it works well. In fact Chafa doesn't need sixel
in Weztermn.