Takes longer than it should to see what the vertical resolution is..
deanrad opened this issue · comments
It looks like it's 7 based on your ticks() function, but that's important enough to put up front, IMHO...
Up front where?
Probably both the README, and spark -h
Is it 7 ?
Very nice work, btw..
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Zach Holman
reply@reply.github.com
wrote:
Up front where?
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#36 (comment)
It is 7.
I think I'm going to hold off on this, mostly because I don't really want it to be estimated in that way. I mean, the sparkline is oft-criticized for being a graph that has statistical problems with it; expecting someone to try to calculate relative sizes of bars sends the wrong message, I think. I'd rather make it about the trending line rather than any absolute numbers.
Thanks, by the way. Much appreciated. :)