Takes longer than it should to see what the vertical resolution is..

Question

Takes longer than it should to see what the vertical resolution is..

deanrad opened this issue 13 years ago · comments

Dean Radcliffe commented 13 years ago

It looks like it's 7 based on your ticks() function, but that's important enough to put up front, IMHO...

Zach Holman · Answer 1 · Wed Nov 16 2011 08:33:35 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time)

Up front where?

Dean Radcliffe · Answer 2 · Wed Nov 16 2011 08:36:11 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time)

Probably both the README, and spark -h

Is it 7 ?

Very nice work, btw..

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Zach Holman
reply@reply.github.com
wrote:

Up front where?

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#36 (comment)

Zach Holman · Answer 3 · Wed Nov 16 2011 08:38:15 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time)

It is 7.

I think I'm going to hold off on this, mostly because I don't really want it to be estimated in that way. I mean, the sparkline is oft-criticized for being a graph that has statistical problems with it; expecting someone to try to calculate relative sizes of bars sends the wrong message, I think. I'd rather make it about the trending line rather than any absolute numbers.

Thanks, by the way. Much appreciated. :)