[ License ] Many non-code files refer to `the BSD-style license`
lexidor opened this issue · comments
Lexidor Digital commented
This might be intentional, but many .expect
and .in
files say that this library is actually BSD licensed, but the LICENSE files says MIT.
But then again, the CONTRIBUTING.md file says BSD again.
Fred Emmott commented
Not intentional, working on fixing, and digging into why the internal (not-Hack-specific) linter didn't catch these.