Why <strong> (bold) on REPL examples?
ulysses4ever opened this issue · comments
Since the support for REPL ("interactive", >>>-) examples was added 12 years ago (28bd977), it had this strong/bold decoration. I don't see a reason for that and find REPL-heavy examples close to unreadbale. E.g. as shown in this tweet. Is there a reason for this decision? Could we reconsider?
👍
Maybe the ">>>" can be bold instead to set it apart from actual Haskell
syntax.
Also, the bold currently isn't applied consistently on multi-line input.
https://hackage.haskell.org/package/generic-data-0.9.2.1/docs/Generic-Data.html#t:Generically1
I also thought about bold >>> — I like the idea.