[US-06] Project evaluation criteria

[Ángel Gómez]

Summary: As a jury member, I would like to be provided with documentation, a presentation, and a report in accordance with the evaluation rules in order to check that the criteria have been met correctly.

Goal: To have a document that clearly compiles all the information relating to the development of the TFM.

Benefit: This makes it easier to evaluate all the work the student has done to develop the dissertation.

User profile: Jury member.

Scenario:

• Given: that I want to assess the work done by the student,
• When: the student provides the documentation according to the assessment criteria,
• Then: I will be able to assess the student's work.

Functional notes:
The evaluation criteria are:

The student...

• Uses varied, valid, and reliable sources of information and selects that which is relevant to the purpose of the work.
• Makes decisions appropriate to the context and proposes solutions using the knowledge acquired.
• Detects and analyses opportunities to make new proposals.
• Proposes appropriate solutions and justifies decisions taken to solve complex problems.
• Uses formal and informal resources to properly document the development process: conception, planning, analysis, design, implementation, testing, etc.
• Shows clarity and understanding in writing, organizing information appropriately, and using appropriate resources for written discourse. Shows clarity and comprehension in oral expression, organizing information appropriately, and using appropriate resources for oral discourse.

Technical notes:

• None for now.

Dependencies:

• None for now.

Follow-up tasks:

• None for now.

Acceptance criteria:

• The documentation meets the evaluation criteria.