Clarify Number UUID
lambdafu opened this issue Β· comments
uuid.md says:
00. ?decimal index (up to 9999999999%, also 2D indices 4%5)
This needs clarification. Due to the rules for compression, 4%5
should be the same as 4000000000%5000000000
, which is unexpected π The 2D index (4,5) would be represented as 0000000004%0000000005
, right?
It seems number UUIDs are currently unused, so the impact is low.
Yep, so far we are unsure how to implement nice readable array/matrix indices.
The currently working variant is :00001%00002
for matrix[1][2]
@gritzko do you mean 0000000001%0000000002
or 0000100000%0000200000
?
Why should it be readable?
Nope. Frame size limit is 2^31. Hence, we only need five base64 digits for an index.
Hence, this fixed-width form: :00001%00002
Human readability is the reason we need the text format.
Recently, I was working a lot with JNI, which uses JVM's internal notation a lot.
Got used to those (JJ)V
, (JLjava/nio/ByteBuffer;)V
and suchlike.
The mandatory semicolon was a bit inconvenient, but otherwise OK.
@gritzko such exceptions make the format harder to implement. 5 zeroes which will be often shortened to )
don't worth a special format.
@cblp IMO, that's a minor convention. I mean, using the upper 30 bits.
@gritzko OK, this may work