rfc8290 vs rfc8291

[Dave Täht]

your page has a typo, referencing rfc8290 instead of 8291.

I admit, it would be cool if more messaging backplanes did do fair queuing and load shedding, (see for example what uber did: https://eng.uber.com/qalm/ ) but that isn't what you were trying to reference in the text. :)

[Milinda Perera]

Thanks Dave! I've fixed the typo.