📝 *** CLOSE - I see Context( ) returns this type .... *** - r4[Proposal]: Add RequestCtx in ctx that returns *fasthttp from DefaultCtx

[Rob Baruch]

Feature Proposal Description

Give the users access to the whole fasthttp request for more control (i.e. accessing client certs via ctx) by creating a method similar to func (c *DefaultCtx) Request() *fasthttp.Request in ctx.go but instead returns *fasthttp

Alignment with Express API

unknown. don't use javascript

HTTP RFC Standards Compliance

confirmed

API Stability

this feature doesn't affect API Stability

Feature Examples

// RequestCtx return the *fasthttp object
// This allows you to use all fasthttp.RequestCtx methods
// https://godoc.org/github.com/valyala/fasthttp#RequestCtx
func (c *DefaultCtx) Request() *fasthttp.RequestCtx {
    return &c.fasthttp
}

Checklist:

• I agree to follow Fiber's Code of Conduct.
• I have searched for existing issues that describe my proposal before opening this one.
• I understand that a proposal that does not meet these guidelines may be closed without explanation.

[welcome]

Thanks for opening your first issue here! 🎉 Be sure to follow the issue template! If you need help or want to chat with us, join us on Discord https://gofiber.io/discord

[RW]

@rabarar
Have you checked the context method?

fiber/ctx.go

Line 305 in 7ba02c1

 func (c *DefaultCtx) Context() *fasthttp.RequestCtx { 

[Rob Baruch]

Yeah - I literally found it moments *AFTER* posting the Feature Request … lol

…

On Mar 27, 2024, at 5:12 PM, RW ***@***.***> wrote: @rabarar <https://github.com/rabarar> Have you checked the context method? https://github.com/gofiber/fiber/blob/7ba02c14cf53c5a5f8171a0e4eb125ef4615f7c0/ctx.go#L305 — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2942 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABB2J6DNJQODB4MKPQGCR6LY2MR35AVCNFSM6AAAAABFLUCT22VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDAMRTHE4TQOJTHA>. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.

[RW]

Can we close the feature request? Because its there?

[Rob Baruch]

I think that’s prudent :) Thanks!

…

On Mar 27, 2024, at 5:22 PM, RW ***@***.***> wrote: Can we close the feature request? Because its there? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2942 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABB2J6AY3D42ZTZHJZCXVBTY2MTAVAVCNFSM6AAAAABFLUCT22VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDAMRUGAYTEOBRHA>. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.