compilation fails with bazel in resty 2.8
pdeva opened this issue · comments
while it works fine with go build, with bazel build it fails.
bazelisk build //...
INFO: Invocation ID: 93e6226f-ae83-49ae-9202-4a7030c7fd62
INFO: Analyzed 116 targets (1 packages loaded, 13 targets configured).
INFO: Found 116 targets...
ERROR: /home/pdeva/.cache/bazel/_bazel_pdeva/b1a4ac6988a94eb0ad1222a792d4139b/external/gazelle~0.33.0~go_deps~com_github_go_resty_resty_v2/BUILD.bazel:8:11: GoCompilePkg external/gazelle~0.33.0~go_deps~com_github_go_resty_resty_v2/resty.a failed: (Exit 1): builder failed: error executing command (from target @gazelle~0.33.0~go_deps~com_github_go_resty_resty_v2//:resty) bazel-out/aarch64-opt-exec-2B5CBBC6/bin/external/rules_go~0.41.0~go_sdk~astradot_monorepo__download_0/builder_reset/builder compilepkg -sdk external/rules_go~0.41.0~go_sdk~astradot_monorepo__download_0 ... (remaining 46 arguments skipped)
Use --sandbox_debug to see verbose messages from the sandbox and retain the sandbox build root for debugging
external/gazelle~0.33.0~go_deps~com_github_go_resty_resty_v2/client.go:420:29: undefined: digestTransport
external/gazelle~0.33.0~go_deps~com_github_go_resty_resty_v2/client.go:421:23: undefined: digestCredentials
external/gazelle~0.33.0~go_deps~com_github_go_resty_resty_v2/request.go:522:29: undefined: digestTransport
external/gazelle~0.33.0~go_deps~com_github_go_resty_resty_v2/request.go:523:23: undefined: digestCredentials
external/gazelle~0.33.0~go_deps~com_github_go_resty_resty_v2/transport.go:28:26: undefined: transportDialContext
compilepkg: error running subcommand external/rules_go~0.41.0~go_sdk~astradot_monorepo__download_0/pkg/tool/linux_arm64/compile: exit status 2
INFO: Elapsed time: 7.155s, Critical Path: 0.08s
INFO: 2 processes: 2 internal.
FAILED: Build did NOT complete successfully
make: *** [Makefile:56: build] Error 1
seems you havent put digest.go in your BUILD.bazel file
@pdeva Can you please try the branch gh-700 and share your feedback? then I would create a PR.
@pdeva Can you please try the branch
gh-700and share your feedback? then I would create a PR.
yup works fine with this
@pdeva Thanks for the confirmation.
when is this expected to be released?