Any way to bypass the requirement for tenant in headers?

[Tony Wang]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

• For some APIs I create using this awesome boilerplate is used by another service that is maintained by another provider, it is impossible for those services to insert the tenant header in their requests going to my API.
• Is it possible to drop the requirement for tenant in headers?

Describe the solution you'd like
Use some kind of annotation in controller method to bypass the requirement for tenant in headers.

Thanks

[Dan Soltesz]

Pass it in query string

…

________________________________ From: Tony Wang ***@***.***> Sent: Friday, July 14, 2023 6:10:29 PM To: fullstackhero/dotnet-webapi-boilerplate ***@***.***> Cc: Subscribed ***@***.***> Subject: [fullstackhero/dotnet-webapi-boilerplate] Any way to bypass the requirement for tenant in headers? (Issue #874) [CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe] Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. * For some APIs I create using this awesome boilerplate is used by another service that is maintained by another provider, it is impossible for those services to insert the tenant header in their requests going to my API. * Is it possible to drop the requirement for tenant in headers? Describe the solution you'd like Use some kind of annotation in controller method to bypass the requirement for tenant in headers. Thanks — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/uhKICo20r4f57MLT1gIQC?domain=github.com>, or unsubscribe<https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/cH4YCpYqv5iqjGNcDPyan?domain=github.com>. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>