Address title redundancy
erikreagan opened this issue · comments
When we started this, "Craft" wasn't in the name so we added "for Craft" in the header. With Craft in the name of the Cheat Sheet there's some redundancy in the header now.
Thoughts? Should we change anything?
What if it were just "The Field Cheat Sheet for Craft"? I like that we have the Craft logo displayed. @erikreagan
@andyfought I like having the logo displayed too. I'd prefer consistency for how it's mentioned on twitter, web stuff, etc.
What if the word Craft in the title was the mark and we drop "for Craft" from the end? Would that be strange?
I don't think I like it, thoughts?
Yea, I don't like it either. Hmm. What if we drop "The"?
I don't think that'll be as nice. There's something about the way the "for" breaks up the type that is nice.
Can we just adjust the wording on Twitter and uses on the web to "the field syntax cheat sheet for craft"?
Let's just leave it for now. I'm gonna see how the community uses it and responds to it. It may evolve into more than just fields, so let's not waste effort figuring this one out. You good with that?
I like "the field syntax cheat sheet for craft". I agree with @erikreagan on how "for" breaks up the type. ;)
Random thought:
