Missing ExecTraceBytes field in implicit message

[Lee]

Hi,
I found that when fvm apply the message, I can receive ExecTraceBytes

filecoin-ffi/fvm.go

Line 120 in acda280

 ExecTraceBytes:     resp.ExecTrace, 

But when fvm apply the implicit message, it is missing, is this expected?

filecoin-ffi/fvm.go

Line 137 in acda280

 return &ApplyRet{ 

[Steven Allen]

Nope, that looks like an oversight. Thanks for fixing it.