AKD Clients should prove the sequential nature of a history proof
slawlor opened this issue · comments
To identify "missing" history, client verifiers of a key history proof should confirm that the proof updates are sequential (i.e. the version numbers increase by 1 starting from 0 (or 1, need to confirm initial version number))
This is a small verification change, and the information is available in the clients already, but presently would be a second step and should simply be included inside the key_history_verify
call.