Remove COObject.name

Question

Remove COObject.name

qmathe opened this issue 8 years ago · comments

Since we have COPersistentRoot.name for naming documents, COObject.name could be removed.

COObject subentities could declare a name property if they need one. We could still keep COObject.displayName and document as overridable in subclasses if we feel like it.

Deleted user · Answer 1 · Mon Oct 10 2016 06:19:16 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time)

It looks like -displayName simply returns -name. So if -name is removed but -displayName is not then what would -displayName return?

Eric Wasylishen · Answer 2 · Mon Oct 10 2016 06:49:28 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time)

I guess displayName would be removed as well?

Quentin Mathé · Answer 3 · Tue Oct 11 2016 05:00:15 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time)

Agreed, removing -displayName sounds good.