EIP editors should explain that ERC was renamed to EIP
fulldecent opened this issue · comments
Pull Request
No response
What happened?
The EIP editors have apparently decided that ERCs shall be renamed to EIPs. (I can see this in the CI bots' notices.)
That's fine and I respect your control of this naming.
Before I go around telling everybody that ERC-721 is now renamed to EIP-721, it will be helpful if the EIP official documentation does not contradict me. Please do these:
- Update https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/README.md to use this new wording
- Make a blog post documenting this significant change and link to it prominently from the README and EIP-1
Relevant log output
No response
Update https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/README.md to use this new wording
The official documentation about the EIP process is in EIP-1. Here is the reference you are looking for: https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1#eip-numbers
Make a blog post documenting this significant change and link to it prominently from the README and EIP-1
The EIP editors don't have a blog. I know @MicahZoltu does, but he's no longer an editor. I guess I could submit a PR to the ethereum.org website repo.
I would also hold off on telling people that it's EIP-721, as the naming is still a contentious issue: #5273
@fulldecent the EIP Editor group has been discussing it yesterday EIPIP Meeting. It seems the raw unfinalized consensus in the EIP Editors are it will be flexible between ERC and EIP.
lol this is weak guidance from a group that is setting rules for people that make rules and guidance
this is weak guidance
We aren't here to guide anything that is outside the scope of the EIPs and related repositories. As discussed in the EIPIP 62 meeting, we don't care if you call the standard with number 20 EIP-20, ERC-20, or BANANA-20. For the purposes of EIPs, the standard must be referenced with the hyphenated form EIP-20, but the consensus is currently split on that anyways.
Got it, thank you
There has been no activity on this issue for 1 week. It will be closed after 3 months of inactivity.
There has been no activity on this issue for 1 week. It will be closed after 3 months of inactivity.
There has been no activity on this issue for 1 week. It will be closed after 3 months of inactivity.
This issue was closed due to inactivity. If you are still pursuing it, feel free to reopen it and respond to any feedback.