use `u128` instead of `(u64, u64)` as byte level representation
dylanhart opened this issue · comments
Dylan Hart commented
Using a u128
primitive will lead to a simpler and maybe faster implementation. The only problem is that this is currently a nightly feature, so u128
support will have to be implemented after it hits stable. This is a breaking API change due to the Ulid
tuple constructor.
Dylan Hart commented
Fixed in 932e950