reported FAIL about glyphsname
RosaWagner opened this issue · comments
The glyphs don't seem to have production names
🔥 FAIL: Glyph names are all valid? (com.google.fonts/check/valid_glyphnames)
🔥 FAIL The following glyph names do not comply with naming conventions: to-0, to-1, to-10, to-100, to-101, to-102, to-103, to-104, to-105, to-106 and 118 more.
Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists.
Ok, fixed glyphs naming. Thank you!