duckduckgo / content-scope-scripts

Content Scope Scripts handles injecting in DOM modifications in a browser context; it's a cross platform solution that requires some minimal platform hooks.

Geek Repo:Geek Repo

Github PK Tool:Github PK Tool

Content scope scripts

Content Scope Scripts handles injecting in DOM modifications in a browser context; it's a cross platform solution that requires some minimal platform hooks.

Content Scope Features API

Each platform calls into the API exposed by content-scope-features.js where the relevant JavaScript file is included from features/. This file loads the relevant platform enabled features. The platform itself should adhere to the features lifecycle when implementing.

The exposed API is a global called contentScopeFeatures and has three methods:

  • load
    • Calls the load method on all the features
  • init
    • Calls the init method on all the features
    • This should be passed the arguments object which has the following keys:
      • 'platform' which is an object with:
        • 'name' which is a string of 'android', 'ios', 'macos' or 'extension'
      • 'debug' true if debugging should be enabled
      • 'globalPrivacyControlValue' false if the user has disabled GPC.
      • 'sessionKey' a unique session based key.
      • 'cookie' TODO
      • 'site' which is an object with:
        • 'isBroken' true if remote config has an exception.
        • 'allowlisted' true if the user has disabled protections.
        • 'domain' the hostname of the site in the URL bar
        • 'enabledFeatures' this is an array of features/ to enable
  • update
    • Calls the update method on all the features

Features

These files stored in the features directory must include an init function and optionally update and load explained in the features lifecycle.

Features Lifecycle

There are three stages that the content scope code is hooked into the platform:

  • load
    • This should be reserved for work that should happen that could cause a delay in loading the feature.
    • Given the current limitations of how we inject our code we don't have the Privacy Remote Configuration exceptions so authors should be wary of actually loading anything that would modify the page (and potentially breaking it).
    • This limitation may be re-addressed in manifest v3
    • One exception here is the first party cookie protections that are triggered on init to prevent race conditions.
  • init
    • This is the main place that features are actually loaded into the extension.
  • update
    • This allows the feature to be sent updates from the browser.
    • If this is triggered before init, these updates will be queued and triggered straight after.

Platform specific integration details

The inject/ directory handles platform specific differences and is glue code into calling the contentScopeFeatures API.

  • In Firefox the code is loaded as a standard extension content script.
  • For Apple, Windows and Android the code is a UserScript that has some string replacements for properties and loads in as the page scope.
    • Note: currently we don't implement the update calls as it's only required by cookie protections which we don't implement.
  • All other browsers the code is stringified, base64 encoded and injected in as a self deleting <script> tag.

In the built output you will see these dramatic differences in the bundled code which is created into: /build

App specific integration replacements

  • $CONTENT_SCOPE$ - raw remote config object
  • $USER_UNPROTECTED_DOMAINS$ - an array of user allowlisted domains
  • $USER_PREFERENCES$ - an object containing:
    • platform: { name: '<ios | macos | extension | android>' }
    • debug: boolean
    • globalPrivacyControlValue: boolean
    • sessionKey: <CSRNG UUID 4 string> (used for fingerprinting) - this should regenerate on browser close or every 24 hours.

Features scope injection utilities

To handle the difference in scope injection we expose multiple utilities which behave differently per browser in src/utils.js and ContentFeature base class. for Firefox the code exposed handles xrays correctly without needing the features to be authored differently.

  • ContentFeature.defineProperty()
    • defineProperty(object, propertyName, descriptor) behaves the same as Object.defineProperty(object, propertyName, descriptor)
    • The difference is for Firefox we export the relevant functions so it can go across the xray
    • Use this method if Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors(object).propertyName should to exist in the supporting browser.
  • ContentFeature.wrapProperty(object, propertyName, descriptor)
    • A simple wrapper around defineProperty() that ignores non-existing properties and retains unspecified descriptor keys.
    • Example usage: this.wrapProperty('Navigator.prototype.userAgent', { get: () => 'fakeUA' })
  • ContentFeature.wrapMethod(object, propertyName, wrapperFn)
    • Overrides a native method. wrapperFn() will be called in place of the original method. The original method will be passed as the first argument.
    • Example usage:
    this.wrapMethod(Permissions.prototype, 'query', async function (originalFn, queryObject) {
        if (queryObject.name === 'blocked-permission') {
            return {
                name: queryObject.name,
                state: 'denied',
                status: 'denied'
            }
        }
        return await nativeImpl.call(this, queryObject)
    })
  • DDGProxy
    • Behaves a lot like new window.Proxy with a few differences:
      • has an overload method to actually apply the function to the native property.
      • Stores the native original property in _native such that it can be called elsewhere if needed without going through the proxy.
      • Triggers addDebugFlag if get/apply is called.
      • Sends debugging messaging if debug is enabled.
      • Allows for remotely disabling the override based on script URL via shouldExemptMethod.
      • Fixes value.toString() to appear like it was defined natively.
    • Example usage:
    const historyMethodProxy = new DDGProxy(this, History.prototype, 'pushState', {
        apply (target, thisArg, args) {
            applyRules(activeRules)
            return DDGReflect.apply(target, thisArg, args)
        }
    })
    historyMethodProxy.overload()
  • DDGReflect
    • Calls into wrappedJSObject.Reflect for Firefox but otherwise exactly the same as window.Reflect

Testing Locally

Depending on what you are changing, you may need to run the build processes locally, or individual tests. The following all run within GitHub Actions when you create a pull request, but you can run them locally as well.

  • eslint
  • Typescript
  • Unit tests (jasmine)
  • Feature Integration Tests (puppeteer)
  • Feature Integration Tests (playwright)
  • Special Pages Integration Tests (playwright)
  • Feature Build process + Special Pages Build process

If you want to get a good feeling for whether a PR or CI run will pass/fail, you can run the test command which chains most of the following together

# run this if you want some confidence that your PR will pass
npm test

eslint

# run eslint to check for errors
npm run lint

# run eslint and attempt to fix errors
npm run lint-fix

Typescript

# run Typescript to check for errors
npm run tsc

# run Typescript in watch mode
npm run tsc-watch

Unit Tests (jasmine)

Everything for unit-testing is located in the unit-test folder. Jasmine configuration is in unit-test/jasmine.json.

npm run test-unit

Feature Integration Tests (puppeteer)

Everything within integration-test (minus the playwright folder) is controlled by Jasmine + Puppeteer. The configuration is within integration-test/config.js

Note: when you run this command, it will also be executed all workspaces too. For example, within packages/special-pages

npm run test-int

Feature Integration Tests (playwright)

Everything within integration-test/playwright is integration tests controlled by Playwright. These should be defaulted to for any new tests that include UI elements (such as click to load)

npm run playwright

Special Pages Integration Tests (playwright)

There are tests within packages/special-pages/tests that are dedicated to testing the special pages. These tests will be ran automatically when you execute npm run test-int from the root. But during development you might find it useful to run them individually.

cd packages/special-pages
npm run test-int

Feature Build process

To produce all artefacts that are used by platforms, just run the npm run build command. This will create platform specific code within the build folder (that is not checked in)

npm run build

Note: This will also execute the build process witin packages/special-pages

About

Content Scope Scripts handles injecting in DOM modifications in a browser context; it's a cross platform solution that requires some minimal platform hooks.

License:Apache License 2.0


Languages

Language:JavaScript 81.6%Language:HTML 14.7%Language:CSS 3.6%Language:Swift 0.1%Language:Shell 0.0%