Deployment ring attribute name
NatMarchand opened this issue · comments
Description
Currently the attribute name used for application metadata deployment ring is not consistent with other values. Changing it to deployment.ring
would make it consistent with deployment.environment
.
Reproduction Steps
var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args);
builder.Services
.AddApplicationMetadata(metadata =>
{
metadata.DeploymentRing = "test1";
});
builder.Services
.AddServiceLogEnricher(options =>
{
options.EnvironmentName = true;
options.DeploymentRing = true;
});
Expected behavior
2024-01-25 14:45:32 InstrumentationScope Program
2024-01-25 14:45:32 LogRecord #0
2024-01-25 14:45:32 ObservedTimestamp: 2024-01-25 13:45:27.9344822 +0000 UTC
2024-01-25 14:45:32 Timestamp: 2024-01-25 13:45:27.9344822 +0000 UTC
2024-01-25 14:45:32 SeverityText: Information
2024-01-25 14:45:32 SeverityNumber: Info(9)
2024-01-25 14:45:32 Body: Str(Hi there !)
2024-01-25 14:45:32 Attributes:
2024-01-25 14:45:32 -> service.name: Str(myservice)
2024-01-25 14:45:32 -> deployment.environment: Str(preview)
2024-01-25 14:45:32 -> deployment.ring: Str(test1)
Actual behavior
2024-01-25 14:45:32 InstrumentationScope Program
2024-01-25 14:45:32 LogRecord #0
2024-01-25 14:45:32 ObservedTimestamp: 2024-01-25 13:45:27.9344822 +0000 UTC
2024-01-25 14:45:32 Timestamp: 2024-01-25 13:45:27.9344822 +0000 UTC
2024-01-25 14:45:32 SeverityText: Information
2024-01-25 14:45:32 SeverityNumber: Info(9)
2024-01-25 14:45:32 Body: Str(Hi there !)
2024-01-25 14:45:32 Attributes:
2024-01-25 14:45:32 -> service.name: Str(myservice)
2024-01-25 14:45:32 -> deployment.environment: Str(preview)
2024-01-25 14:45:32 -> DeploymentRing: Str(test1)
Regression?
No response
Known Workarounds
No response
Configuration
dotnet 8
Other information
No response
Hmmm, looks like an oversight as we were migrating things over to this repo.
@xakep139 Can we fix this? Or are we stuck with it for compat reasons at this point?
@geeknoid that's not an oversight. You can see the comment @iliar-turdushev added in his PR: https://github.com/dotnet/extensions/pull/4545/files#r1356746467
TL;DR: we used PascalCase
in all logging dimensions where we couldn't use OTel Semantic Conventions (that was the case for DeploymentRing
dimension). That was discussed with .NET folks.
OK, closing as by-design.