Documentation
mancvso opened this issue · comments
It is really hard to evaluate this library when no documentation related to usage is available.
I agree it could be better, but the read me does describe basic usage, no?
What pieces would you like to see?
On Jun 24, 2014 11:58 AM, "Brian Vidal" notifications@github.com wrote:
It is really hard to evaluate this library when no documentation related
to usage is available.—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#6.
Maybe an example of using Epic for processing news or user input.
Anyway, I just wanted to state that usage looks just too complex and can be better with full code examples, more descriptive texts and a little less specific terminology. I really hope it is targeted to average developers.