[Feature]: I recommend you to transfer project from single repository to organisation
Waujito opened this issue · comments
Feature?
This project is very large with lots of packages. And I think, it would be better if you transfered this in to organisation from single repo. In organisation you can split this project as packages.
Package
discordx
I wish, but unable to get the org username, I wish for.
discord_ts, discord_x, discord-x, discordtsx names are free
except discordtsx, others are not available.
I would also like to suggest, xdiscord, discordtx
nope, that will be discord-xxx because @VictoriqueMoe won't agree without it 😅
I actually checked discordxxx, but it is taken. :(
discord-ts could be our name, but the owner of that account has not agreed to give up the name.
I personally would want to avoid -s. They are just so irritating when typing URLs.
You might be able to email GitHub requested an account like discordx be removed so you can use it, I don't know if GitHub does this but some services will remove inactive / abandoned accounts to make way for new / active accounts to use the name.
I dont think they will do that. Because there was big attack similar to this recently because of few popular python packages who's original authors deleted their GitHub accounts and someone else "hijacked" that account and put malicious code into those packages via their account. It's complicated. Ref: https://www.theregister.com/2022/05/24/pypi_ctx_package_compromised/
So, it is risky for them to just delete accounts which had a significant user base in the past.
Hmmm didn't know, I mean discord.ts is very active and with a fair few people backing it whereas the user discordx, They might consider that.
Yeah. Maybe. But its very hard to convince them.
I guess we'll see what @OceanRoleplay want's to do.
@OceanRoleplay wants to use discord-xxx 👀
I have talked about this before. and while i agree we should move to an organisation. we need to get the name right, and currently, all the ones we want are taken.
discord-xxx is great, only because i am bias.
but we can always name it something less abstract.
I am happy to pay for a paid Team account for it. let me know the name and i can create it and assign @OceanRoleplay as the owner
+1 for discord-xxx 😀
first, discord.ts, then discordx and now, discord-xxx. I would say, sorry. I am not ready for the change.
@VictoriqueMoe maybe you should try with owner of discord-ts. Maybe offer him some money... or something...
@VictoriqueMoe maybe you should try with owner of
discord-ts. Maybe offer him some money... or something...
I shall flirt with him and offer him things.
first,
discord.ts, thendiscordxand now,discord-xxx. I would say, sorry. I am not ready for the change.
We have to change, sorry, Harry, but i agree, we need to do it.
Better merge both names.
discordx + discord-ts = discord-tsx
And good news, that name is available.
Not a bad name actually, Would fix the confusing problem where the repo name is called discord.ts but the package is called discordx xD
Better merge both names.
discordx + discord-ts = discord-tsxAnd good news, that name is available.
tsx confuses with .tsx file extension which means jsx notation in TypeScript used by React for example
Package is already discordx. Let's make the repo organization as xdiscord.
@Waujito I would like yo inform you that this concern is under consideration since months, we will move to organization in near future. Thanks for reaching out us for this.