Masks

Question

Masks

plaverty9 opened this issue 6 years ago · comments

Pipal is my go-to password analyzer. Love it. The one additional thing I wish it had is the hashcat mask generator that PACK has. I always run both analyzers, but PACK just to get the masks. If pipal had that, that would be pretty awesome. I thought of just merging the two, but PACK is python and pipal is ruby. I've never tried ruby myself, otherwise I'd jump in and try to create a version myself. Sorry...

Here is the source code for PACK: https://thesprawl.org/projects/pack/

Robin Wood · Answer 1 · Mon May 21 2018 22:15:00 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time)

Never heard of PACK but will have a look, shouldn't be too hard to do.

…

On Mon, 21 May 2018, 15:02 plaverty9-r7, ***@***.***> wrote: Pipal is my go-to password analyzer. Love it. The one additional thing I wish it had is the hashcat mask generator that PACK has. I always run both analyzers, but PACK just to get the masks. If pipal had that, that would be pretty awesome. I thought of just merging the two, but PACK is python and pipal is ruby. I've never tried ruby myself, otherwise I'd jump in and try to create a version myself. Sorry... Here is the source code for PACK: https://thesprawl.org/projects/pack/ — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#43>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAHJWeIzrkbt6jhRvIS7Ns1vKLFynClKks5t0sj7gaJpZM4UHCez> .

Patrick Laverty · Answer 2 · Mon May 21 2018 22:18:03 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time)

Thanks! Here is a sample output, where the number at the end is the number of passwords matching that mask.

[+] ?u?l?l?l?l?l?l?l?d: 08% (231)
[+] ?s?u?l?l?l?s?u?l?l?l?d: 07% (197)
[+] ?u?l?l?l?l?d?d?d: 07% (192)
[+] ?u?l?l?l?l?d?d?d?d: 04% (109)
[+] ?u?l?l?l?l?l?l?d: 03% (80)
[+] ?u?l?l?l?l?l?d?d: 02% (74)
[+] ?u?l?l?l?d?d?d?d: 02% (60)
[+] ?u?l?l?l?l?l?d?d?d?d: 02% (60)

Robin Wood · Answer 3 · Mon May 21 2018 23:34:36 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time)

Is this the type of output you are after?

Hashcat masks (Top 10)

?l?l?l: 1 (20.0%)
?d?d?d: 1 (20.0%)
?l?l?l?d?d?d: 1 (20.0%)
?l?l?l?l?l?l?l?d?l?l?l?d?d?d?l?l?l?l?l?l?l?l?l?l?l?l?l?l: 1 (20.0%)
?d?d?d?l?l?l?l?d?d?d: 1 (20.0%)

Patrick Laverty · Answer 4 · Mon May 21 2018 23:43:45 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time)

Yep! That looks great! Thanks!

Robin Wood · Answer 5 · Mon May 21 2018 23:45:01 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time)

In which case, it's been there all the time! Enable the hashcat_mask_generator.rb.

…

On Mon, 21 May 2018 at 16:43 plaverty9-r7 ***@***.***> wrote: Yep! That looks great! Thanks! — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#43 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAHJWdhG4JkQ7xwikGo1Fe2PLTibTSdjks5t0uCzgaJpZM4UHCez> .

Patrick Laverty · Answer 6 · Mon May 21 2018 23:45:56 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time)

<kick>

Thank you, sir! As always, you're the best!