Re-evaluate the scope of my experiments
dgoldsb opened this issue · comments
I want to re-evaluate several things to get a complete view of how I should proceed, as I know am at a point where I can get things done with minimal coding required (at most I need to add a function or a measure, nothing that requires more than 5 minutes).
Why are the preliminary results the way they are?
I see that nudges often have 0 impact, which is (I think) because of how deterministic the system gets (it doesn't matter if there is a nudge if every state ends up the exact same).
Do I do things different from DJ?
In the end I want to continue where DJ left off, I need to see if I am actually using the same approach, otherwise any link between our results is meaningless.
Does it extend Rick's paper well, and is the workload/importance similar?
In the end I both want to extend Rick's paper, and use it as a measuring stick if my results are meaningful.
How does my current structure work with my old hypotheses?
I want to compare to my old hypotheses and still what I can still do.