denglab / SeqSero2

SeqSero2

Geek Repo:Geek Repo

Github PK Tool:Github PK Tool

O:9 interpretation

ATML-TD opened this issue · comments

Hello,

Most of my Enteritidis genomes are identified as Hillingdon due to detection of the O-9,46_wbaV__1002 sequence with no apparent link to the match score, , e.g.:


Output_directory: SeqSero_result_08_26_2019_12_42_017562833
Input files: Salm201905696_S134_R1.fastq.gz
O antigen prediction: 9,46
H1 antigen prediction(fliC): g,m
H2 antigen prediction(fljB): -
Predicted subspecies: I
Predicted antigenic profile: 9,46:g,m:-
Predicted serotype: Hillingdon
associated log:
O_scores:
O-1,3,19_not_in_3,10__130 73.07692307692307
O-9,46_wbaV__1002 54.09836065573771
Special_scores:
uniqmers_I 100.0
gntR-family-regulatory-protein_dt-positive__291 100.0
gntR-family-regulatory-protein_dt-negative__291 89.81132075471699
allmers 12.978168162433965
sdf_I_AF370707__333 91.20521172638436
sdf-I_AF370707__333 91.20521172638436

##other genome
Output_directory: SeqSero_result_08_26_2019_12_42_014760921
Input files: Salm201905700_S136_R1.fastq.gz
O antigen prediction: 9
H1 antigen prediction(fliC): g,m
H2 antigen prediction(fljB): -
Predicted subspecies: I
Predicted antigenic profile: 9:g,m:-
Predicted serotype: Enteritidis
Note: sdf gene detected.
associated log:
O_scores:
O-1,3,19_not_in_3,10__130 73.07692307692307
O-9,46_wbaV__1002 80.84016393442623
Special_scores:
uniqmers_I 100.0
gntR-family-regulatory-protein_dt-positive__291 96.98113207547169
gntR-family-regulatory-protein_dt-negative__291 86.79245283018868
allmers 13.15002227738527
sdf_I_AF370707__333 91.20521172638436
sdf-I_AF370707__333 91.20521172638436

I dont really get how the O:9 is determined.
Thx for your help

Hey,

Thanks for asking. SeqSero2 uses the gene O-9,46_wbaV__1002 to differenticate O:9,46 and O:9. For genome Salm201905696, the match score of O-9,46_wbaV__1002 is too low to be called (default minimum match score is 70), which would influence the final prediction output. The low match score of the gene wbaV could be caused by unsufficient sequencing coverage; or, it's also possible that the wbaV in your Enteritidis genomes is a new allele that differs from the one in our allele database.
You can share your genomes to us and we will be happy to do the troubleshooting and try to fix the issue.

Thanks!