There's a significant bug in dnsmasq stats post 0.2.
darron opened this issue · comments
darron froese commented
Don't have time to track it down right now - but it doesn't appear to give results that made sense.
The statistics were hundreds of times higher than before - which doesn't seem to be right.
Will be digging into it next week.
darron froese commented
darron froese commented
It's somewhere in here?
Or else there's a bug in 0.2 that is radically undercounting DNS. I guess we'll see.
darron froese commented
Duplicated it today.
It's kind of stupid - but I needed a >=
sign in two places. Commit incoming.