Should @at use @at(x,y) instead of @at(y,x)?
brndto opened this issue · comments
Should at use at(x,y) instead of at(y,x)?
I'm personally used to the x coordinate coming before the y in about 95% of cases I've used coordinates, do others agree with this or am I going crazy and y comes before x with coordinates.
Sorry @branditodesign, x, y here should be row and column. I'll update the doc .
In that case, it should stay the same at(column, row) going by spreadsheet standards.
I usually use row before column myself :D
Would be nice to see more discussion about this.
That's a breaking change, which could break stuff already made by others who will update. It's best not to change it, I'm afraid.
Closing this by now but please feel free to comment