Transaction Ordering Vuln
ESultanik opened this issue · comments
Add an example like this: https://github.com/ConsenSys/smart-contract-best-practices#transaction-ordering-dependence
I think this is now addressed by race_condition
Issue Status: 1. Open 2. Started 3. Submitted 4. Done
This issue now has a funding of 100.0 DAI (100.0 USD @ $1.0/DAI) attached to it as part of the Ethereum Community Fund via ECF Web 3.0 Infrastructure Fund fund__.__
- If you would like to work on this issue you can 'start work' on the Gitcoin Issue Details page.
- Want to chip in? Add your own contribution here.
- Questions? Checkout Gitcoin Help or the Gitcoin Slack
- $41,785.34 more funded OSS Work available on the Gitcoin Issue Explorer
this link leads to nowhere
https://github.com/ConsenSys/smart-contract-best-practices#transaction-ordering-dependence
@mgcolburn
What are you looking for?
@salkuyateh93 the test specifies
"Add an example like this: https://github.com/ConsenSys/smart-contract-best-practices#transaction-ordering-dependence"
And there is no example under the link
The link doesn't work anymore because it linked to a README that has been changed.
A correct link for that could be e.g. https://github.com/ConsenSys/smart-contract-best-practices/tree/0b67609241f8a56aa50ff3fd9af1bf1e5b546149#transaction-ordering-dependence
(I found a commit around the date of this issue and clicked on browse files).
Anyway, as @mgcolburn pointed out this is addressed by race condition so I am closing this issue.
@dguido should this issue have funding for a Gitcoin bounty or should I cancel this bounty? Thanks! 👍
Whoops, I think cancel it.
Sure bet, cancelling it :)
Issue Status: 1. Open 2. Cancelled
The funding of 100.0 DAI (100.0 USD @ $1.0/DAI) attached to this issue has been cancelled by the bounty submitter
- Questions? Checkout Gitcoin Help or the Gitcoin Slack
- $39,667.13 more funded OSS Work available on the Gitcoin Issue Explorer