`lines-changed-only` should assert `files-changed-only` implicitly
2bndy5 opened this issue · comments
User intuition probably implies that the lines-changed-only
option should implicitly mean files-changed-only
is true, but this is not the case under the hood.
I think this is partially implemented in #81 (as part of the solution to #74), but it would be better to make the source explicitly change the value of files-changed-only
if lines-changed-only
is not disabled.