ICS20-V2 Path Forwarding E2E Tests
chatton opened this issue · comments
Summary
Tracking issue for ICS20-V2 Path Forwarding E2E tests
Tests:
- Given 3 chains with
ics20-2
channels between A and B, and between B and C, perform a successful transfer of tokens from A to C through B. [Nikolas] #6758 - Given 3 chains with
ics20-2
channels between A and B, and between B and C, send first tokens from A to B, and then perform a successful unwind + forward transfer of the IBC tokens from B to C through A. Topology: A -> B -> C, and A -> C. [Nikolas] #6778 - Given 3 chains with
ics20-2
channels between A and B, and between B and C, perform a transfer of tokens from A to C through B, where the hop between B and C will time out. - Given 3 chains with
ics20-1
channels between A and B and B and C, perform a successful channel upgrade from v1 to v2 for both channels and send tokens from A to C through B. [Nikolas] #6793 - Integration test: a test where the
memo
triggers the execution of a callback only on the final destination. [Nikolas]
For Admin Use
- Not duplicate issue
- Appropriate labels applied
- Appropriate contributors tagged/assigned
I'll start by taking the following one:
Given 3 chains with ics20-2 channels between A and B, and between B and C, perform a successful transfer of tokens from A to C through B.
Just a note to remember to update the unreleased
compatibility tests when we have all the e2e tests ready.
Given 3 chains with ics20-2 channels between A and B, and between B and C, perform a transfer of tokens from A to C through B, where the hop between B and C will time out. [Nikolas]
I discussed with @chatton on this one and it doesn't seem like we have a way to cause a timeout on e2e tests. We could arrange something like creating a relayer that only watches A->B, wait for timeout, and then update it to watch B to C, but that would be ugly and not possible to do cleanly right now. Right now we do have an integration timeout test (TestOnTimeoutPacketForwarding
) which might be enough. @crodriguezvega what do you think?