Vague chaining jobs example
jpds opened this issue · comments
The "Chaining jobs" example here:
docs/lit/reference/pipelines.lit
Lines 94 to 119 in 51ff49f
...is slightly vague in that it references a unit
4 different times. It isn't immediately clear what the unit
in the build
passed:
stage refers to - it ultimately refers to the job name but it would be easier if these had different names for clarity.
makes sense, i'll update it!