license uncertainity

[pgajdos]

Hi!

Sorry for this boring report as license issues always are. You claim to license this module under GPLv3 or MIT. However, COPYING is LGPL. Could you please consider to package GPLv3 as COPYING instead?

[Lincoln Clarete]

Thanks for raising that, I'll clean up this mess :) and the end goal will be to make sure that it's well communicated that this library is dual licensed under MIT & GPLv3. My actionables here are:

1. Replace /COPYING with the GPLv3 text
2. Update README.md to inform about MIT

Thank you!!!

[pgajdos]

Thanks!

[Julian Berman]

Looks like this is done / closeable possibly.

[Lincoln Clarete]

Good call!