Serializer class improvement suggestion

[hauru]

Hi,

first of all, thanks for the recent update. Serializer class seems useful to get the code organized better. I have some additional suggestions though that i hope make sense.

The Serializer-level options could be perhaps implemented as class/instance attributes. This would make it possible to have a base serializer class from which defaults could be inherited. What could also be useful is for the related dictionary to accept Serializer class / instances as values. With these two things together it will be possible to declare and assign common settings in just one place - the base serializer class. It makes sense in case of hooks, for example, when a common logic needs to be executed for any instance of every serializable model.

[Byron Ruth]

The Serializer-level options could be perhaps implemented as class/instance attributes. This would make it possible to have a base serializer class from which defaults could be inherited.

Good idea. I suppose it can be layered. Class attributes, then instance attributes, then runtime arguments.

What could also be useful is for the related dictionary to accept Serializer class / instances as values.

Yes.