cloudformation describe_change_set with IncludePropertyValues=True response lacking StatusReason
ilons opened this issue · comments
Describe the bug
When calling the describe_change_set function on a cloudformation client for a stack with IncludePropertyValues set to True, the response does not include StatusReason if the change set Status is FAILED.
Expected Behavior
The StatusReason should be included in the response both when IncludePropertyValues is set to True.
Current Behavior
The response returned does not include the StatusReason for a change set with a Status of FAILED (at least not when it failed due to no changes).
When performing the same call with IncludePropertyValues set to False, the StatusReason is included in the response.
Reproduction Steps
Create a CloudFormation stack
Call create_change_set using the same template
Call describe_change_set on the created change set with IncludePropertyValues set to True
Possible Solution
No response
Additional Information/Context
This seems to be a bug in CloudFormation itself, as the AWS Console are performing two calls when viewing a change set, one with include property values set to true, and one with it set to false.
SDK version used
1.34.134
Environment details (OS name and version, etc.)
Python 3.10.12, Linux Pop!_OS 22.04 LTS
Thanks @ilons for reaching out. I tried to reproduce this issue but was not able do. When running the describe_change_set command and getting a FAILED status, I got the StatusReason in my response with IncludePropertyValues was either set to True or False.
Could you provide code snippets to help us reproduce the issue? Also if you can share debug logs (with sensitive info redacted) by adding boto3.set_stream_logger('') to your script, that could give us insight into the underlying issue here.
Boto3 commands like describe_change_set involve calls to upstream APIs (in this case DescribeChangeSet) so there may be some edge case issue with the CloudFormation API and/or here that we would need to escalate to that team.
Could you provide code snippets to help us reproduce the issue? Also if you can share debug logs (with sensitive info redacted) by adding
boto3.set_stream_logger('')to your script, that could give us insight into the underlying issue here.
Thank you for the swift response, I'm afraid it would be very hard for me to provide this in the same timely fashion, as I'm leaving for vacation. However, I'll put a note to provide this as soon as I get back.
Greetings! It looks like this issue hasn’t been active in longer than five days. We encourage you to check if this is still an issue in the latest release. In the absence of more information, we will be closing this issue soon. If you find that this is still a problem, please feel free to provide a comment or upvote with a reaction on the initial post to prevent automatic closure. If the issue is already closed, please feel free to open a new one.