Gender bias heterogeneity zoom-ins

[Dmitry Kobak]

I am not happy with the gender bias heterogeneity zoom-ins in the scroller. For example, compare the surgery case with what we show in the paper:

vs.

The panel in the paper seems to show more points and the orange-y island corresponding to the veterinary surgery is rather obvious. Whereas on the website it's impossible to find unless one knows where to look for.

I edited the markdown now to increase the dot size and to put the unknown-gender papers to the background. Not sure if this is going to fix it.

[Dmitry Kobak]

I edited the markdown now to increase the dot size and to put the unknown-gender papers to the background. Not sure if this is going to fix it.

Edited the scrollership to switch off the transparency in those slides -- hope I did it correctly (instead of setting it to full transparency), could you check? In the last commit.

[Benjamin Schmidt]

Looks to be pretty close now. If this still looks bad we can increase the number significantly higher--opacity is a dynamic target based on zoom level and point size.

…

On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 11:55 AM Dmitry Kobak ***@***.***> wrote: I edited the markdown now to increase the dot size and to put the unknown-gender papers to the background. Not sure if this is going to fix it. Edited the scrollership to switch off the transparency in those slides -- hope I did it correctly (instead of setting it to full transparency), could you check? In the last commit. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#48 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIPFZUJSORRYRICVKCIRDDW7LXIHANCNFSM6AAAAAAWOLR3CE> . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[Dmitry Kobak]

Yes, looks good.