Allow more labels at a larger zoom level
ritagonmar opened this issue · comments
Currently there is a good number of labels tags at a zoom level like this one:
We were wondering if it would make sense to include more label tags at a lower scale, like the one in the picture below. Basically to have approximately the same amount of label tags as in the picture above, but on this level.
However, not include more or any labels at all in an even larger zoom level, like the one shown here:
So the idea being to keep adding tags of the from the same journal title
keywords just with a lower threshold of points? Yes, I think this is
possible, but my current algorithm is not good at applying repeat labels to
the same large cluster—I can label small isolated islands easily, but big
wormy connected things get just one label. In my ideal world we’d have a
hierarchical agglomeration clustering of the whole 2d map and then label
directly from tokens or mesh headings—I spent a little time yesterday
trying this with dbscan but the clusters were too stringy.
…On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 8:13 AM Rita González Márquez < ***@***.***> wrote:
Currently there is a good number of labels tags at a zoom level like this
one:
[image: image]
<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82372364/227937007-2eb6b894-8fc2-40ec-b1b7-68c560237c8a.png>
We were wondering if it would make sense to include more label tags at a
lower scale, like the one in the picture below. Basically to have
approximately the same amount of label tags as in the picture above, but on
this level.
[image: image]
<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82372364/227937177-bf7fc740-ac5d-4ac5-acc2-eaf539b0b93f.png>
However, not include more or any labels at all in an even larger zoom
level, like the one shown here:
[image: image]
<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/82372364/227937321-db710b78-6317-4ea0-b8ae-b6232c10f9f0.png>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#33>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIPFZVVT27BT2U3OBEAJYLW6F75TANCNFSM6AAAAAAWJDKTFE>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
That's good to discuss, but has low priority -- we can definitely launch as is. I added the [enhancement] tag.